BRISKODA - The Skoda Forums  
The site is under going some updates, please bear with us while we finish them off.

Power before remap?

This is a discussion on Power before remap? within the Fabia I forums, part of the Skoda Model Discussion Area category; what kind of power was your furby vrs's producing before the remap? they are all over 130bhp as standard i ...


Go Back   BRISKODA - The Skoda Forums > Skoda Model Discussion Area > Fabia I

Pronounced "bris-skoda", a brisk skoda.

Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Old 05-04-2005, 16:43   #1
Briskodian
 
mikejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: wigan
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Power before remap?

what kind of power was your furby vrs's producing before the remap? they are all over 130bhp as standard i have heard?
__________________
179BHP AND 340 TORQUE!!!
mikejay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote

Find out about Freedom to remove these ads.

Old 05-04-2005, 16:45   #2
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I spoke to james and he said they are all up to 130, and there is the odd one over 130 most ever seen 133 or 134 i think. I was supprised as i had heard most 130's were 140 and most 150's (golfs) were 170. Either way, my 1600 mile vRS pulled 127.?? and 226 lb/ft so not too disapointed i suppose.
__________________
Currently sporting a Alfa 156 JTDm Lusso.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PVO_Dave of VXON View Post
Being an enthusiast doesn't mean you have to be marque blinkered!
Andy vRS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 16:58   #3
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The figures VAG release are nowhere near the actual figures. Most furby vRS's will be 140+. My mates A3 2.0TDI Sport 140PD was measured at 156bhp with no mods whatsoever.

It's the same with 0-60 figures. Why they do it I don't know, perhaps someone on here does?
Neo_Vrs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:00   #4
Briskodian
 
EddyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,899
Thanks: 40
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo_Vrs
The figures VAG release are nowhere near the actual figures. Most furby vRS's will be 140+. My mates A3 2.0TDI Sport 140PD was measured at 156bhp with no mods whatsoever.

It's the same with 0-60 figures. Why they do it I don't know, perhaps someone on here does?
Only modification was a generous rolling road! Standard cars make standard figures or manufacturers would get in trouble with insurers.
__________________
EddyH

Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI
Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport
EddyH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:08   #5
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyH
Only modification was a generous rolling road! Standard cars make standard figures or manufacturers would get in trouble with insurers.
It is well known that VAG 'tone down' their official figures, whether you think it was a 'generous' rolling road which I have never come across before.

The official 0-60 time for a furby vRS is somehting like 9.6 seconds. I think I can speak for every furby vRS owner on here by saying this isn't the case. Knocking a second off that can easily be achieved without any mods.
Neo_Vrs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:13   #6
Proud Dad
 
Chavyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darkest Deepest Peterborough
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mine has been rated at 145bhp with no mods.

I spoke to Skoda UK about this and they turned round and told me the figure they quote is a minimum so every car should have at least 130bhp.
__________________
2004 '54' Citroen Picasso 1.6 16v Desire HDI in Wicked Red
2004 '54' Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CDTI Energy

Ex Skoda owner
Chavyboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:23   #7
Om nom nom nom
 
Neo_VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 12,407
Thanks: 77
Thanked 175 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo_Vrs
It is well known that VAG 'tone down' their official figures, whether you think it was a 'generous' rolling road which I have never come across before.

The official 0-60 time for a furby vRS is somehting like 9.6 seconds. I think I can speak for every furby vRS owner on here by saying this isn't the case. Knocking a second off that can easily be achieved without any mods.
Thats because they figure their cars with a full tank of fuel, some luggage and a passenger.

Youve also got to bear in mind that because its a worldwide market, fuel quality differs greatly and will also affect how a car performs. EG.. the octy vRS in India (i think) is only rated @ 150bhp due to the poor fuel quality.

but as you can imagine with a mass produced engine, they will vary, even more so if its turbocharged. ive seen my car get 149.6bhp std on one rolling road, and 131 on another
if you wanted to be techincal, the PD130 engine is officially rated at 128bhp.

the reason why most RR over-read is because they are of the older inertia type (like jabbas) and they just cant be set up accurately for the huge torque of a PD engine.
__________________
ColGod the UberMod


,___,
[O.o]
/)__)
-"--"- ORLY??


Last edited by Neo_VR; 05-04-2005 at 17:29.
Neo_VR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:30   #8
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyH
Only modification was a generous rolling road! Standard cars make standard figures or manufacturers would get in trouble with insurers.
Not strictly true. I know GT-R skylines are miles away from stock 276 power. The performance figures prove that with 1600kg kerb weight and <13sec 1/4 lol. The other one which is infact the other way is the current shape Volvo R series, with a claimed 300bhp - but there hasn't been 1 (within the global enthusiast comunity) that has got anywhere near that figure.
__________________
Currently sporting a Alfa 156 JTDm Lusso.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PVO_Dave of VXON View Post
Being an enthusiast doesn't mean you have to be marque blinkered!
Andy vRS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:45   #9
Briskodian
 
The The's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East
Posts: 469
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Either way the original quoted power by Skoda got the fabia rated group 9 insurance which i think is a bargain, especially as the 130 Ibiza is a group 13
The The is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:52   #10
Proud Dad
 
Chavyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darkest Deepest Peterborough
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by The The
Either way the original quoted power by Skoda got the fabia rated group 9 insurance which i think is a bargain, especially as the 130 Ibiza is a group 13
But it's not all about engine power though it's also down to Nickability. If you leave your keys in your skoda most people knock on the door to give them back rather than steal the car
__________________
2004 '54' Citroen Picasso 1.6 16v Desire HDI in Wicked Red
2004 '54' Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CDTI Energy

Ex Skoda owner
Chavyboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 17:56   #11
Briskodian
 
HellFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I know my car wasnt completely accurate on the RR figure at Jabba, the reason I believe this is because if you look at the JBS RR day there was one which was supposed to be 192 bhp, but infact was 168, no call me mad but they do seem a tad optimistic shall we say...

Do JBS have the newer sytle RR?
__________________
Metro Blue '06' 5 Door Astra 1.8 SRi
HellFire is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:03   #12
Briskodian
 
Cheekymonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warwick
Posts: 425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by HellFire
I know my car wasnt completely accurate on the RR figure at Jabba, the reason I believe this is because if you look at the JBS RR day there was one which was supposed to be 192 bhp, but infact was 168, no call me mad but they do seem a tad optimistic shall we say...

Do JBS have the newer sytle RR?
T'was me... I was at least expecting ~180bhp but there you go. I've had a chat with James at JBS about my figures and he explained that it has a lot to do with the RR accuracy. JBS have recently spent a large amount on a top-spec RR which is so accurate it can detect even tyre distortion when the tyres squirm on the rollers!!! As a result, a car that previously ran 175bhp on the old JBS rollers now only sees 165bhp. The car hasn't lost power, the equiptment is just more accurate...

Still means I can't should about 190bhp. Time for hybrid turbos and NOS!!!
__________________
Dave



Ex - Fabia VRS Owner

Now Z4 Coupe
Cheekymonkey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:19   #13
Briskodian
 
EddyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,899
Thanks: 40
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy vRS
Not strictly true. I know GT-R skylines are miles away from stock 276 power. The performance figures prove that with 1600kg kerb weight and <13sec 1/4 lol. The other one which is infact the other way is the current shape Volvo R series, with a claimed 300bhp - but there hasn't been 1 (within the global enthusiast comunity) that has got anywhere near that figure.
That's down to the 'gentlemens agreement' they have in Japan for the self imposed 276bhp limit.
__________________
EddyH

Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI
Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport
EddyH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:24   #14
DGW
BRISKODA Staff
 
DGW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 17,256
Thanks: 51
Thanked 196 Times in 148 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HellFire
I know my car wasnt completely accurate on the RR figure at Jabba, the reason I believe this is because if you look at the JBS RR day there was one which was supposed to be 192 bhp, but infact was 168, no call me mad but they do seem a tad optimistic shall we say...
Done under identical conditions? And in a similar vein, how does VAG test engines to arrive at 'official' bhp figures for publication? I'm blowed if I know.
__________________
Denis

2002 Octavia 1.8T 4X4 turbo Estate - rebreathed on by Jabba ... 31.93mpg
2007 Fabia vRS - CC, ESP and full leather trim by Seat Surgeons ...48.57 mpg...

Last edited by DGW; 05-04-2005 at 18:28.
DGW is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:33   #15
Briskodian
 
EddyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,899
Thanks: 40
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGW
Done under identical conditions? And in a similar vein, how does VAG test engines to arrive at 'official' bhp figures for publication? I'm blowed if I know.
VAG use a bench Dyno to get there figures.

As has been mentioned earlier in the thread you can only get accurate figures on load based ECU cars on a load based rolling road. Inertia based RR's give much higher figures as they allow the engine to spin up unrealistically quick.
__________________
EddyH

Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI
Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport
EddyH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:36   #16
Briskodian
 
HellFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Does that mean the custom mapping my car got will be way out aswell as in not that accurate? so in effect higher BHP figure are attainable from an AmD/REVO remap although this is generic as it would have been mapped origonally on a better RR.
__________________
Metro Blue '06' 5 Door Astra 1.8 SRi

Last edited by HellFire; 05-04-2005 at 18:43.
HellFire is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:43   #17
Briskodian
 
EddyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,899
Thanks: 40
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HellFire
Does that mean the custom mapping will be way out aswell, so in effect it is better to get an AmD/REVO remap also it is generic?
From what I have seen Jabba figures and Revo figures aren't that much different on similar cars with similar mods. The difference is on both diesels and petrols running a jabba map they have a big spike low down and then drop off. With Revo the boost climbs and holds.

The result is Jabba has more punch low down but loses it's breath at the top. This is usually reflected as Jabba having higher peak torque and Revo having higher bhp. But there isn't a huge difference.

The spike on jabba maps won't show up on jabba's RR because there isn't enough load at low revs due to the way it works so the ECU doesn't see maximum load and doesn't give maximum boost. However on the road it does, especially up hill.

This also explains why Jabba cars don't go into limp mode on the RR despite being on there 4hrs but once loaded up on a real road they hit limp due to a boost spike.
__________________
EddyH

Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI
Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport

Last edited by EddyH; 05-04-2005 at 18:45.
EddyH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:45   #18
Fabian
 
bryand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 1
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
When mine was done at JBS in October (4,300 miles) it got 129.5 bhp and 227.5 lb/ft (bog standard).
And it's got better since then (with a little help from Messrs Green & Milltek).
bryand is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:50   #19
Briskodian
 
HellFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Messrs Green?
__________________
Metro Blue '06' 5 Door Astra 1.8 SRi
HellFire is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:55   #20
Briskodian
 
EddyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 4,899
Thanks: 40
Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HellFire
Messrs Green?
They make cotton air filters and dynatwist CAI's among other things.
__________________
EddyH

Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI
Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport
EddyH is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 18:59   #21
Briskodian
 
HellFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Better than Gren or K&N or on a par?
__________________
Metro Blue '06' 5 Door Astra 1.8 SRi
HellFire is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 19:07   #22
Om nom nom nom
 
Neo_VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 12,407
Thanks: 77
Thanked 175 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyH
From what I have seen Jabba figures and Revo figures aren't that much different on similar cars with similar mods. The difference is on both diesels and petrols running a jabba map they have a big spike low down and then drop off. With Revo the boost climbs and holds.
Thats well explained Eddy... as you can see from the graphs, my car and Cheekys pull similar results. true, my milage covered seems to give me the edge(as proven on previous occasions), but the Milltek probably took alot of that away (and sounds damn fruity too)
__________________
ColGod the UberMod


,___,
[O.o]
/)__)
-"--"- ORLY??

Neo_VR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 09:17   #23
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North
Posts: 2,709
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheekymonkey
JBS have recently spent a large amount on a top-spec RR which is so accurate it can detect even tyre distortion when the tyres squirm on the rollers!!! As a result, a car that previously ran 175bhp on the old JBS rollers now only sees 165bhp. The car hasn't lost power, the equiptment is just more accurate...
See here http://photobucket.com/albums/v494/r...t=Revo4001.jpg
and here http://photobucket.com/albums/v494/r...o2001Large.jpg
for a good example of this. Notice I was running the same settings on both occasions.

As far as I'm concerned if better accuracy means lower figures then fair enough. To paraphrase James 'Black and white TV was great until colour came along'. I know there's nothing wrong with my car so I'm not really bothered.
__________________
Rich.

Skoda Octavia RS
rich1068 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 12:37   #24
Briskodian
 
mikejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: wigan
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
is there any one on here who has has a furby with a tunning box on the RR. it would be interesting what kind of figers they were gettin??
__________________
179BHP AND 340 TORQUE!!!
mikejay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2005, 11:40   #25
Briskodian
 
mikejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: wigan
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
anyone??
__________________
179BHP AND 340 TORQUE!!!
mikejay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
226 bhp Standard Jabba Remap tom3949 Octavia I 35 10-03-2005 22:38
Remap v Dragon tuning module? pbirkett Maintenance & Performance 10 20-01-2005 12:31
Modest remap? pbirkett Fabia I 6 29-12-2004 13:43
This site is killing me jonny 5 Maintenance & Performance 24 04-04-2004 19:58
What are the chances of having a remap being "found" by dealer??? inquirer Maintenance & Performance 29 21-11-2003 13:30


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09.