This is a discussion on Optimax advantage? within the Maintenance & Performance forums, part of the General Motoring Discussions category; Noticed over a while that a some of you choose to use 98RON petrol (Shell Optimax for example) - especially ...
| |||||||
Pronounced "bris-skoda", a brisk skoda. | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| | #1 |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: North West
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Noticed over a while that a some of you choose to use 98RON petrol (Shell Optimax for example) - especially those with remaps. Is there any advantage to gain from using this in a standard car? Just wondering as its relatively cheap at the mo round here (83p / litre) and my local garage is a Shell garage. Cheers, DaveJ |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Haven't got my vrs yet...picking it up tomorrow, however, I've been using optimax and BP Ultimate in my 1.3 Nissan Micra for a good while now and it makes a difference. The car is a lot smoother to drive and seems more lively. Had to put std fuel in over the last week or so as the pumps at the local station were out of order, and the car now feels sluggish. If it improves my present car, I would imagine you would feel a difference in yours...suffice to say I will be filling my vrs up tomorrow with either optimax or BP Ultimate... Ventmore |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I found It made a big diffence 0 - 2000 rpm before the turbo spools. felt very flat otherwise compared with normal unleaded (95RON). compared with SUL (97 Ron) is far more subjective and has been the subject of debate many times before. edited to add, if you dont feel any difference after one tank. try a second tank full. The benifits can sometimes only be felt after a few tanks.
__________________ Colin Last edited by ccrosb; 27-06-2004 at 21:09. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Ventmore | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| sorry, flat with normal. It will feel better with optimax esp after a few tanks.
__________________ Colin |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: North West
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Ventmore, good luck tomorrow picking the car up. Make sure you give it a quick once over to check all is perfect. Its the best time to get things sorted - before you accept it. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| @fastVeRSion Cheers mate...can't wait to get it. I will certainly give it a thorough check over though before I drive it away. Ventmore |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Wheelspinning 'round the wet roads of Manchester
Posts: 1,284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I find BP Ultimate is generally better quality than Optimax (albeit more expensive). Optimax, IIRC, is normal 95 RON fuel with an octave booster, rather than proper SUL. I've found Optimax to be inconsistent, even buying it from the same forecourt. One week it could be great (better than Ultimate), next week it feels like I've filled it with Asda's "Extra Special" diesel'n'grit.
__________________ Rob Illing Play Interstellar War: "Fleet Battles" and "Conquest" for free! The ST220 has landed! Die Micra, Die! |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: North West
Posts: 408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Got both a BP and Shell local, so i'll have the chance to try them both over the next few weeks. If i can feel the difference, then i suppose i'll stick with the one i find feels better. Have tried optimax on my bike in the past, but didn't really get on with it. The bike felt like it was running on treacle, does that make sense? It just lost its zing somehow.. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Warrington
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Optimax = Dodgymax ! Theres been lots of discussion on various forums about optimax being rather inconsistant (had experience of 1 tank like rocket fuel, another and milk floats pass you!!) and being the cause of engine failures (scooby net?). It would appear that it has a short shelf life and/or has very specific requirements for storage. As others have said Ultimate is a completely different approach and imho is the better option, either diesel or petrol. (Both mine run on ultimate) Get a smoother running and more econimcal engine consistantly.
__________________ Fabia TDI PD100 "Q" and driving school car. ![]() Citroen C4 Coupe 1.6hDi+EGS with disability adaptations. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Andover
Posts: 18,101
Thanks: 15
Thanked 323 Times in 281 Posts
| Quote:
) and according to the majority on Scoobynet causes large amounts of knock in the Scooby engine. Not had a chance to properly try the BP Ultimate diesel or Shell Diesel Extra properly on the Fabia yet.... ![]() Chris
__________________ Holding up the traffic in a little Italian.......... | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| BRISKODA Staff Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: darkest Hampshire
Posts: 8,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
| The age old Optimax debate..... .....IIRC Optimax is really unleaded which then has an additive put in the storage tanks. I've found it to give better, smoother response. BP Ulitmate is more consistant but doesn't "feel" as good as Opitmax...also a lot more expensive where I live. Fabrezza put Optimax down to causing his Scooby to go pop.
__________________ Adrian. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: the real world
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| The only claim that I see Shell makes is it cleans your injectors - i.e. it has a Redex type cleaner additive. As with any high detergent product inc oils, use on older engines which have not used them previously can cause major problems. IIRC Shell has tried this product two or three times over the last several years, and one incarnation was withdrawn following a lot of lawsuits regarding engine damage. BP seem to be offerring a properly enhanced product with performance claims. But there doesn't seem to be anywhere as many BP stations as there once were.
__________________ Count me out... |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Site owner Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Hill & Mountains of North Wales
Posts: 10,206
Thanks: 18
Thanked 137 Times in 69 Posts
| Yes and no. No for the dodgy tanks, yes for the good tanks. I'll use as and when, but the when is only when I can run 3 or 4 tanks back to back, otherwise I'll skip. Might drop a bottol of stp booster in on 95 if I'm feeling kind. However there is a difference if you get a map/off the shelf whatever for 98 then run 95...it will possibly hurt your car and wallet. Hence I only run my 98 program when I know it's on 98, then if I can't find a shell, I'll change to 95 and still have the fun ![]() The difference between the two is good enough to be felt in the *** dyno *assuming it's good stuff* That said I don't think I've ever had a really bad "this feels dire" moment.
__________________ ColinD - 97/100 Limited Edition Octavia vRS < For Sale www.BRISKODA.net :: Site Owner. E-Mail : webmaster at briskoda dot net Got a comment to make about the site? Please feel free to use the feedback form here, we welcome your views. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Proud Dad Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Darkest Deepest Peterborough
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
IIRC the higher the RON value the less likely the fuel is to detonate (Explode before the spark plug ignites the fuel/air mixture) The only time I would personally use Optimax or the BP variant would be in a high compression car eg. A Turbo. It would be pointless to run it in a non turbo car unless it was running a very high compression setup. That is IMHO but that's the way I understood it, BTW I have also heard Optimax RON value is made up by using normal petrol and adding additives to it so you might get a varied RON rating depending on how it is stored and mixed together as I think storage plays a big part in petrol RON value. Someone mentioned optimax has a few days shelf life before the RON value drops so fill up straight after the tanker has been.
__________________ 2004 '54' Citroen Picasso 1.6 16v Desire HDI in Wicked Red 2004 '54' Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CDTI Energy Ex Skoda owner | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: the real world
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Shell claims increased "responsiveness" though cleaner injectors - not an increased RON rating (only BP claims increased RON) From the Shell website Quote:
WHY DO YOU THINK SHELL OR BP DONT PUBLISH ANY SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ECONOMY OR PERFORMANCE GAINS e.g. dyno graphs with brand a v brand b BECAUSE THE MARKETING HYPE WONT HOLD UP! Words like "responsiveness" are carefully chosen to avoid legal pitfalls (esp in the USA).
__________________ Count me out... Last edited by skodakid; 28-06-2004 at 14:33. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Proud Dad Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Darkest Deepest Peterborough
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
The only evidence I have seen of an increased RON rating is the labelling on the pump, but there again you could label the pump up with the Words JAM & CUSTARD but don't mean you are putting this in your tank. If it does have a higher rating, Joe average probably wouldn't be able to tell in the engine response anyway, it is the feel good factor I believe and a way to make the petrol companies money for old rope.
__________________ 2004 '54' Citroen Picasso 1.6 16v Desire HDI in Wicked Red 2004 '54' Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CDTI Energy Ex Skoda owner Last edited by Chavyboy; 28-06-2004 at 15:06. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| BRISKODA Staff Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: darkest Hampshire
Posts: 8,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
| Thw whole Optimax thing is very perplexing. All I know is that it gives a chrisper and smoother response even though I have no data to back it up. It's not a perceptional thing either as I know how my RS peforms. I tried Ultimate and while I found it the engine ran as smooth as Optimax, it did not feel more response and gave less mpg. I guess it's like a person's choice of tuner.....you use the one your happy with and pay whatever it costs. ![]() p.s Opitmax is rated at 98RON and Ultimate at 97.
__________________ Adrian. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2004 Location: the real world
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Some people on this thread have referred to Optimax as having a RON (octane rating) of 98. It is standard premium unleaded (95) to the BS requirement. BP Ultimate is 97. Only some cars have a ECU which self adapts to RON level.
__________________ Count me out... |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Proud Dad Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Darkest Deepest Peterborough
Posts: 3,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
http://www.millersoils.net/pdf_downl...ers_octane.pdf As tested by Millers. It's not sold as 98 ron but the Octane is greater than Normal unleaded isn't it. BTW do you require a Knock Sensor to adapt for different fuel types ?
__________________ 2004 '54' Citroen Picasso 1.6 16v Desire HDI in Wicked Red 2004 '54' Vauxhall Corsa 1.3 CDTI Energy Ex Skoda owner Last edited by Chavyboy; 28-06-2004 at 15:48. | |
| | |
BRISKODA.net is operated by Summit 360 Ltd