BRISKODA - The Skoda Forums
The site is under going some updates, please bear with us while we finish them off.

1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

This is a discussion on 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response within the Octavia I forums, part of the Skoda Model Discussion Area category; Say both cars (ie 1.8t 4x4 and NA Civic) and ticking over. If you tap the civic's throttle pedal, you ...


Go Back   BRISKODA - The Skoda Forums > Skoda Model Discussion Area > Octavia I

Pronounced "bris-skoda", a brisk skoda.

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Old 04-05-2006, 18:46   #1
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Say both cars (ie 1.8t 4x4 and NA Civic) and ticking over. If you tap the civic's throttle pedal, you see the revs rise up pretty quiclky. Now you try that in the 1.8t (DBW) and you barely get any response. I know the turbocharger is creating lot's of backpressure, but how slow is too slow when it comes to throttle response in our cars?

Last time i vagcom'd my car, i had the multiplicative trim in -20%, which indicates something is wrong, but i havent found out what it is. Anyway, is my richness choking the engine at low revs and reducing my throttle response, or are the 1.8t really that lifeless?
MaxLugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote

Find out about Freedom to remove these ads.

Old 04-05-2006, 19:16   #2
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South UK
Posts: 157
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Smaller capacity revvy NA cars will always have quicker throttle response than FI larger capacity cars.

There's more momentum in the engine to gain/loose, I expect VAG 1.8t has a much larger flywheel, and of course, at idle it doesn't have any boost, making it effectively a very low compression ratio NA engine compared to a high compression ratio engine.
__________________
Parents: '02 Octavia 1.9TDi
Me: '99 V Honda Accord Type-R
Sheaf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 19:20   #3
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheaf
Smaller capacity revvy NA cars will always have quicker throttle response than FI larger capacity cars.

There's more momentum in the engine to gain/loose, I expect VAG 1.8t has a much larger flywheel, and of course, at idle it doesn't have any boost, making it effectively a very low compression ratio NA engine compared to a high compression ratio engine.
Actually, my comparison car was a Nissan Primera 2.0 AT, so it was bigger than the 1.8. But the point you make of the low compression at idle makes lots of sense.

Now, could my -20% multi trim be reducing my response even further?
MaxLugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 20:11   #4
BRISKODA Staff
 
SkodiRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: darkest Hampshire
Posts: 8,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Also have to consider the DBW has a built in "sneeze factor" so you will loose a certain amount of immediate response.

I expect the cable throttle 1.8t to have slightly better response to accelerator inputs.
__________________
Adrian.
SkodiRS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 22:11   #5
DGW
BRISKODA Staff
 
DGW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 17,128
Thanks: 49
Thanked 170 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Which measuring block is that trim reading in?

PS: Just found it on Ross-Tech's website here. It's Group 032 - and a figure somewhere near +/- 10% is normal.
__________________
Denis

2002 Octavia 1.8T 4X4 turbo Estate - rebreathed on by Jabba ... 31.93mpg
2007 Fabia vRS - CC, ESP and full leather trim by Seat Surgeons ...48.09 mpg...

Last edited by DGW; 04-05-2006 at 22:22.
DGW is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 23:47   #6
TKW
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 941
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkodiRS
Also have to consider the DBW has a built in "sneeze factor" so you will loose a certain amount of immediate response.
That's what I wanted to write, but didn't know how to phrase it ... the electronics have a little dampening effect. Look at it as a low-pass filter if you like, although I quite like the concept of a sneeze factor
__________________
Octavia 4x4

TKW is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 05:04   #7
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by TKW
That's what I wanted to write, but didn't know how to phrase it ... the electronics have a little dampening effect. Look at it as a low-pass filter if you like, although I quite like the concept of a sneeze factor
true, dbw does have the filter, but what i'm refering to as "tap" is to fully step on the throttle and release right away. Fully opening the intake and letting go. At idle, i dont get more than 400 instantaneous revs from doing this. Would i be right by assuming that the same thing happens to evo's and wrx's and pretty much every turbocharged car?

Now that we are already talking about all this stuff, what can be causing the -20% multi trim, besides the fpr ?
MaxLugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 11:52   #8
Briskodian
 
MC Bodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

re-mapped and fitted with a K&N throttle repsonse is improved, but nowhere near that of my old, slightly tweaked Focus.
__________________
Mk1 Octavia vRS. The thinking man's Hot Hatch.
PS. Give Cyclists Room! We're quite vulnerable. If I can slap your window, you're too close
MC Bodge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 11:57   #9
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Up a tree.
Posts: 12,376
Thanks: 7
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

I think its a turbo thing. The 350Z revs much more freely than a remapped 1.8T and the Z has a much large capacity engine too.
Goochie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 12:30   #10
Briskodian
 
Nigel26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walsall, West Midlands
Posts: 2,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

its not to do with the flywheel in the 1.8t is it? i'm sure i read somewhere that they have a single mass flywheel to keep the idle steady when rolling in traffic...

may be barking up the wrong tree there.

i've noticed the throttle response on mine is nothing like the R19 16v i had before. i just put it down to DBW and being turbo'd.
__________________
Sea Grey Mondeo Titanium X
Nigel26 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 13:03   #11
BRISKODA Staff
 
SkodiRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: darkest Hampshire
Posts: 8,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel26
its not to do with the flywheel in the 1.8t is it? i'm sure i read somewhere that they have a single mass flywheel to keep the idle steady when rolling in traffic...

may be barking up the wrong tree there.

i've noticed the throttle response on mine is nothing like the R19 16v i had before. i just put it down to DBW and being turbo'd.

Should be duel mass flywheel....it's a fair point.
__________________
Adrian.
SkodiRS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 14:34   #12
Briskodian
 
Nigel26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walsall, West Midlands
Posts: 2,298
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkodiRS
Should be duel mass flywheel....it's a fair point.
sorry, yes dual mass... not single...

its something else i notice with the vRS, how slow the revs die off when your blip the throttle... i know thats down to the flywheel. maybe the same is said for the revs rising...
__________________
Sea Grey Mondeo Titanium X
Nigel26 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 15:58   #13
Briskodian
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

How many of you revmatch all the time? I always do, on everyday driving because i hate the shock of the clutch having to match engine speed with transmission speed. The slow throttle response makes revmatching hard to do propperly, specially because of how long it takes to rev the engine. How do you cope with this, or am i the only freak who doesnt like to use the synchros a lot?
MaxLugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 17:26   #14
BRISKODA Staff
 
SkodiRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: darkest Hampshire
Posts: 8,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by MC Bodge
re-mapped and fitted with a K&N throttle repsonse is improved, but nowhere near that of my old, slightly tweaked Focus.
I could understand how remapping may improve response but not a filter......a freer flowing filter will only allow more, cooler air to enter which will produce more power.

However from a standing start you are not inputting cooler air...more ambient temp air or even hot air from heat soak.

On the move the response it deffo better but then that's due to freer flowing cooler air.
__________________
Adrian.
SkodiRS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 20:04   #15
Briskodian
 
MC Bodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1.8t vs NA, Tap Throttle Response

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkodiRS
I could understand how remapping may improve response but not a filter......

Having done both at the same time, I can't be totally sure which made the difference can I?
__________________
Mk1 Octavia vRS. The thinking man's Hot Hatch.
PS. Give Cyclists Room! We're quite vulnerable. If I can slap your window, you're too close
MC Bodge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:41.


Disclaimer: This is not an official SKODA site and is not affiliated to SKODA in any way. Visit the Official SKODA Website.
Views and opinions are given by the poster and do not reflect the views of BRISKODA.net nor SKODA.
All trademarks and copyrights remain property of their respective owners.

PLEASE NOTE - PERSONAL ABUSE, ABUSE AGAINST THIS OR ANY OTHER WEBSITE OR ANY COMPANY WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
OFFENDERS WILL BE MODERATED OR EVEN BANNED
.

BRISKODA.net is operated by Summit 360 Ltd

Website © 2002-2008 BRISKODA ltd & SUMMIT360 ltd E. & O.E.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100