This is a discussion on 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD within the Octavia II forums, part of the Skoda Model Discussion Area category; Originally Posted by skomaz Iavn, Suggest you check with Skoda rather than a motoring website. All brochures note Skoda 2.0TDi's ...
| |||||||
Pronounced "bris-skoda", a brisk skoda. | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| | #26 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: On the back of an AA truck with a failed turbo
Posts: 10,756
Members Car: Octavia II 2.0 TDi Elegance Thanks: 30
Thanked 195 Times in 146 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD I believe the 2.0 in the old shape superb was an 8v version , but I'm pretty sure the Octavia engines were all 16v
__________________ Alex "I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away" www.drzoidberg.co.uk |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Check the engine code. BKD is 16-valve, BMM is 8-valve. At the end of last year if you bought a 2-litre TDI Octavia with DPF (at least in here) it was always with a 8-valve engine (not sure about the RS though). Haven't checked since last November though. Engine code will tell you how many valves you have.
__________________ Feb 2008 Octavia 2.0 TDI Elegance 140bhp Black Magic/Ivory /w Audience, xenons, front & rear parking sensors, steering wheel with radio controls, 16" Lyra alloys, TPM etc... |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD It depends on which 2.0 TDI. On the superb it's an 8v. I have to say I thought the TDI PD170 was a 16v head too.
__________________ Cars make CO2 and trees absorb CO2. By driving your car you're feeding a tree and helping the environment. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Gents, I assumed that since this was the Octy II section we were talking Octy II 2.0 TDi's? I'm aware that the Superb TDI 2.0 was an 8 valver but, as noted above was pretty certain all the Octy II 2.0 TDi's were 16 valver's, ragardless of DPF or not. Although apologies I do note I did only say "Skoda" 2.0 TDi's rather than "Skoda Octavia" 2.0 TDi's in one post above I'll change it so it's clear...
__________________ If everything was as reliable as a VW... My Skoda would be at the bottom of the JD Power tables! Octavia II 2.0 TDi 4x4 Estate and Fabia I 1.9 TDi Estate and Modified Mk1 Mazda MX-5 1.8iS |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD This is turning out to be quite involved. As the instigator of this thread, I'm beginning to feel guilty. However, going by Jonah81's knowledge, I have a 103kw BKD which by his reckoning is a 16V engine, which probably explains the low end lethargy. But, if there's such confusion out there with a mixture of 8v and 16v 2.0 PDI engines, there has to be differences in performance. They won't all have the same torque and power characteristics; they won't all have the same performance figures; they won't all have the same fuel consumption. If you read a Road Test, which engine was tested? Confused? You should be... |
| | |
| | #31 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD If it's a PD140 in an Octy II (non VRS TDI, not a scount and one other special model maybe the 4x4) then it will be a 16v design.
__________________ Cars make CO2 and trees absorb CO2. By driving your car you're feeding a tree and helping the environment. |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark
Posts: 32
Members Car: 2.0 TDI - DSG Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Last year in Denmark we have 2.0 Tdi - PD Skoda, seat, VW and Audi. With out DPF 16 valve With DPF 8 valve Now all 2.0 Tdi PD-engine have DPF and 8 valve in Denmark
__________________ Cheers Ivan 2.0 Tdi - DSG Last edited by Ivan-DK; 07-07-2008 at 18:57. |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark
Posts: 32
Members Car: 2.0 TDI - DSG Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
It might be fun to see the difference in the various countries. (In Denmark a Elegance have only 15" aloys )
__________________ Cheers Ivan 2.0 Tdi - DSG Last edited by Ivan-DK; 07-07-2008 at 18:14. | |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
AFAIK it was exactly the same here in Finland. At least in November it still was, haven't checked since. That was one of the reasons I didn't get the DPF. That and the 800 euro price difference.
__________________ Feb 2008 Octavia 2.0 TDI Elegance 140bhp Black Magic/Ivory /w Audience, xenons, front & rear parking sensors, steering wheel with radio controls, 16" Lyra alloys, TPM etc... | |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
Octavia Brochure Page 12 and 13 note 2.0 PD 140 BHP with DPF for 4x4 and Scout and Page 23 notes engine spec for 4x4 and Scout as 4 valves per cylinder...
__________________ If everything was as reliable as a VW... My Skoda would be at the bottom of the JD Power tables! Octavia II 2.0 TDi 4x4 Estate and Fabia I 1.9 TDi Estate and Modified Mk1 Mazda MX-5 1.8iS | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Scotland
Posts: 128
Members Car: Octavia TDi Scout Thanks: 8
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Just had a look through the brochure, free upgrade from 4x4 to Scout of the same engine. So basically a Scout for 4x4 money unless you desperately want a 1.9 Diesel. Thats a belter of an offer! (If a mildly capable offroad Estate car is your kind of thing......) You'd almost think it was getting difficult to sell cars as people are finding themselves less flush....... Niall
__________________ 07 Octavia Scout TDi -------------------------- All the Scout standard toys + Xenons, MFSW, Maxidot, Curtain Airbags, OEM Bluetooth. |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark
Posts: 32
Members Car: 2.0 TDI - DSG Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
And now you must read some danish ![]() www.skoda.dk | Modeller | Octavia | Priser og teknik
__________________ Cheers Ivan 2.0 Tdi - DSG Last edited by Ivan-DK; 08-07-2008 at 17:42. | |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
All I can suggest is that there are market differences across the world as one would expect. Either that or some of the technical information in the brochures or on the websites is incorrect.
__________________ If everything was as reliable as a VW... My Skoda would be at the bottom of the JD Power tables! Octavia II 2.0 TDi 4x4 Estate and Fabia I 1.9 TDi Estate and Modified Mk1 Mazda MX-5 1.8iS | |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Again. Check the engine codes. Or call a dealer. ![]()
__________________ Feb 2008 Octavia 2.0 TDI Elegance 140bhp Black Magic/Ivory /w Audience, xenons, front & rear parking sensors, steering wheel with radio controls, 16" Lyra alloys, TPM etc... |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Denmark
Posts: 32
Members Car: 2.0 TDI - DSG Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Good idea, but it does not explain why skoda (and VW) went from 16 to 8 valve on the 2.0 PD when it's with dpf. Each case in denmark ![]()
__________________ Cheers Ivan 2.0 Tdi - DSG |
| | |
| | #41 | |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD Quote:
Maybe there is a difference in the exhaust gas temperature. Who knows.
__________________ Feb 2008 Octavia 2.0 TDI Elegance 140bhp Black Magic/Ivory /w Audience, xenons, front & rear parking sensors, steering wheel with radio controls, 16" Lyra alloys, TPM etc... | |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Briskodian Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD OK hellish confused now... I checked my engine code last night and guess what... BMM... meaning 8 valve with DPF on a 07 plate Octavia 2.0 TDi 4x4! So I guess the brochure is incorrect and some 140bhp Octavias are 8 valve as suggested by our friends in Europe. Apologies as it would seem I have been proved wrong...
__________________ If everything was as reliable as a VW... My Skoda would be at the bottom of the JD Power tables! Octavia II 2.0 TDi 4x4 Estate and Fabia I 1.9 TDi Estate and Modified Mk1 Mazda MX-5 1.8iS |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Briskodian | Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD It's funny how you cannot find that info from the brochures, at least in here you can't. I'd be interested to know if the 140bhp DPF diesels still all are 8-valve engines, and there any difference in the way how it drives. The 16-valve version has most of it power at over 3000 rpm, and can fell quite lethargic at the low end. Haven't driven a 8-valve so cannot do a comparison. They have the same specs though, but maybe there is a difference in how the engines pick up revs or something like that. Oh and I found out why they use 8-valve with DPF's. It's the exhaust gas temperature. It is easier to do the "burn-cycle" with them. Has anybody here had a problem with TDI RS and it's DPF? I remember seeing some threads about the problems people are having with it. Well.... it is a 16-valve engine ![]()
__________________ Feb 2008 Octavia 2.0 TDI Elegance 140bhp Black Magic/Ivory /w Audience, xenons, front & rear parking sensors, steering wheel with radio controls, 16" Lyra alloys, TPM etc... Last edited by Jonah81; 10-07-2008 at 11:10. |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Briskodian Join Date: May 2006 Location: Nottingham, J26 M1
Posts: 444
Thanks: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
| Re: 1.9TDi v 2.0 PD A 16v engine is generally a poor idea on a diesel, or a petrol that is designed for low to mid range punch for that matter. The reason being is that you have to be doing quite a few revs before the lack of valves starts to hamper breathing on an 8v motor. Now a 16v wont' hurt, but to exploit the better upper range breather normally it's cammed, ram air matched and set up to be efficient in the upper rev range. As usual you don't get something for nothing and lose in the low end. There is one important advantage on a diesel however and I speculate this is often the driving factor, the injector can sit central in the cylinder head and directly down in the piston. 2v designs require and angle and it's harder to make an ideal combustion chamber shape. This relates to emissions too. Essentially I am not a fan of 16v designs period. Typically one less camshaft, gearwheel, easier cambelt, 8 less valves to grind in and you find that in the usable daily driving rev range there is no loss of power. Not to mention lighter and cheaper. As for the outright loss of power, a slightly bigger cc or slightly more turbo boost easily makes up for the extra 8 valves. What has to be remembered is that those valves only help at high rpm and they are SMALLER than 8v valves, so you would think it's twice the size, but actually it's 4 small valves vs 2 large ones. It is better flow, but not much. I find it very strange they make 3 diesels right now, all so similar. Tooling and production costs for that is not good. Future emissions laws probably to blame I guess. Greg. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1.6 vs 1.9TDi | bunglebear32 | Fabia II | 9 | 29-04-2008 21:59 |
| 1.9TDI Won't start. | AlexvanDijk | Fabia I | 6 | 09-08-2007 21:07 |
| What next for my 1.9TDI Octy | aerodynamic18 | Octavia I | 19 | 05-04-2007 15:47 |
| 1.9tdi Pd | moley | Octavia II | 4 | 01-04-2007 19:12 |
| Speed of a 1.9tdi | aerodynamic18 | Octavia I | 16 | 10-03-2006 20:46 |
BRISKODA.net is operated by Summit 360 Ltd
Site Design and vBulletin Theme by Alex Pinner (apinner)