Jump to content

Mac1961

Members
  • Posts

    276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mac1961

  1. I took my MY2008 Octy back to the dealer to get both rear fogs lights activated. But they were unable to do it and gave me a printout showing under Byte 3 Bit 1 and Byte 4 Bit 4 -

    2 rear fog lights not possible for 1KO937049A,...T,N or 3CO937049A,D,E,F,G (ECU's).

    Has anyone else come across this problem and is there a way around it?

    Mac

  2. I have a rain sensor and the switch on the top of the stalk increases/decreases the sensitivity of the sensor.

    If you set the stalk on intermittent, i.e. controlled by the sensor, then the speed of the wipers is affected by the amount of rain falling.

    In heavy downpours the wiper speed increases and at times it appears to be faster than the fastest setting on the stalk!

  3. I'm thinking of trading in my fabia for an Octavia and have seen a lot of referances to Maxidot.

    Sorry if it seems a dumb question but what is it? Is it just a trip comuter with more features? Does it only come with Sat nav? Is it standard on some models?

    Maxidot is standard on the L&K models, but can be specified for other ranges. It sits between the tacko and speedo, but instead of using just the top half of the panel, it uses all of the panel. It also enables you to customise the car to your own preferences, such as auto-locking doors; adjusting the coming/leaving home lights, etc.

    Mac

  4. I would also like to know how?

    Cheers

    If you have maxi-dot, it's under Convenience > Door Open (or similar)

    Auto Close - Does as you ask, and locks the doors at about 5mph

    Auto Open - Unlocks the door again when you switch off, and remove your key from the ignition. (As long as you haven't manually changed the locking state since you started off)

  5. Hi again - back now. No worries, since we're both just offering opinions on "the event" .

    I might ask if you'd be kind enough not to query my posts, starting with "Where the hell...?" I've always accepted when I'm wrong or talking through my hat. Anyway :handshke:

    :)

    Mo

    Mo

    I apologise for my opening remark and I don't blame you for getting annoyed. However, I stick by the rest of my text.

    Handshake

    Mac

  6. Erm... from the Highway Code, the following will do. I know the HC is not legally binding in itself, but flouting its rules normally has legal consequences behind it:

    Turning right

    179

    Well before you turn right you should

    • use your mirrors to make sure you know the position and movement of traffic behind you
    • give a right-turn signal
    • take up a position just left of the middle of the road or in the space marked for traffic turning right
    • leave room for other vehicles to pass on the left, if possible

    180

    Wait until there is a safe gap between you and any oncoming vehicle. Watch out for cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians and other road users. Check your mirrors and blind spot again to make sure you are not being overtaken, then make the turn. Do not cut the corner. Take great care when turning into a main road; you will need to watch for traffic in both directions and wait for a safe gap.

    [my bold] Taken from here:

    170-183: Road junctions : Directgov - Travel and transport

    The MPV shouldn't have been there really, but as already said in my post #19,

    quote: ... if the people carrier had to sit in a road when an oncoming vehicle was half a mile away and still was hit, then surely someone should have "let it out" before then or there is a very serious traffic management problem at that junction.Unquote.

    Nothing I have said suggested that a vehicle is entitled to run into another.

    You also say "On the information available" - agreed; my earlier point that you don't know the lorry driver's side, perhaps expectiing it to have cleared (since it shouldn't have been there), speed of travel, forward visbility, weather conditions or road surface - and maybe his brakes failed? We just don't know his side.

    At the risk of repeating myself, howsoever this particular accident happened, there's clearly need for extra care when turning right at that particular junction. It's sure as heck not easy to get junctions changed - I'm learning that the hard way - but just attaching blame and forgetting about it is exactly what riles me.

    Regards

    Mo

    Mo

    I am well aware of the provisions of the Highway Code! Quote: "you don't know the lorry driver's side" Unquote, but then we don't know the MPV driver's side either, so we have to rely on the only witness, whose account is more important than either driver, since drivers often (but not always I admit) give an account that favours their own side. I am not "attaching blame and forgetting about it" as you put it, but I feel that the lorry driver should have stopped and not relied on other drivers to get out of the way to allow the MPV room to move.

  7. Well, there is an argument that if you pull into the middle of a road, you expect an exit to become available. The lorry driver could (IMO) reasonably have expected that the MPV would not have done that without some expectation of getting across the road (and thus out of his way) before he arrived, assuming it's a flowing road and not a high street or near a school where he might be expected to brake at a moment's notice. Seemingly either the lorry driver was wasn't looking (though apparently he was) or the MPV hadn't cleared, but presumably the MPV must also have seen a lorry approaching from half a mile away, so should have reversed if no chance of getting out since it's illegal to cause oncoming traffic to brake on a main road. Not really clear cut to me without knowing all the details.

    I'm not arguing with anyone by the way, just not sure how each side of the story stacks up is all.

    Regards

    Mo

    Where the hell do you get the idea that it's "illegal to cause oncoming traffic to brake on a main road". I know this wasn't the case, but what if the MPV had broken down or had been involved in an earlier accident, do you think he would still be entitled to plough on through regardless. On the information available the truck driver is guilty, no argument. Every driver has a 'duty of care' to every other road user, whether a driver, passenger or pedestrian.

  8. As the MPV had been stationary for some time and the Lorry driver had time to stop, then the latter is guilty of 'Careless Driving'.

    But if, as oilburninnut says, the lorry driver deliberately hit the MPV, the lorry driver is guilty of 'Criminal Damage' and, if there were any injuries, guilty of 'Causing Grievous Bodily Harm' as well. Both those offences are much more serious than 'Careless Driving'.

  9. Since being released from the communist dictatorship the Czech Republic has picked itself up again and as we all know, VW/Audi poured money into Skoda and passed on most of their engineering.

    In other words the Octavia, for example, is a Golf by another name (and a much bigger boot), but a lot cheaper for the same spec.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to BRISKODA. Please note the following important links Terms of Use. We have a comprehensive Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.